TypeScript vs. JavaScript: 7 Key Differences

Posted By :Neeraj kumar Goswami |27th February 2023

TypeScript vs. JavaScript: 7 Key Differences

From the outside, TypeScript can feel like a mystery wrapped in an riddle.

Although it’s not quite a separate programming language from JavaScript, the literacy wind can feel just as steep. The pledge of Typescript is to make development easier, but it also increases the quantum of law you have to write, and that law must pass stricter error checking. What gives?

In this composition, we'll clear up the differences between TypeScript and JavaScript and illuminate the stylish use cases for each.

What are the differences between TypeScript and JavaScript?

  • lower problems and bugs in product Less error dispatches in development
  • More autocomplete from type delineations Less completely- featured IDE experience
  • Write further law Write lower law
  • fluently prognosticate how your law will run further surprises
  • Advanced literacy wind Lower learning wind
  • collected Interpreted
  • Trans- collected, meaning it can collect to any type of JS, including ES5 and ES6 Can not be trans- collected and is written in only one interpretation
  • stationary vs dynamic languages
  • One constant pressure in the world of programming is between statically- compartmented and stoutly- compartmented languages. To understand the difference between TypeScript and JavaScript, let’s first clear up the differences between these two programming paradigms.


stationary languages more early crimes, but the law is safe
A stationary language requires you to declare the data type of variables when you define them. For case, say I wanted to define the variable x as the number 24. In a stationary language, I would tell the computer,' This variable x, where I plan to store some figures, presently equals 24.'

The computer would also consider x a number- storehouse variable. 24 could ultimately change to 4, 240, or-7, but it would always remain anumber.However,' still, the language would throw up an error and the program would refuse to run, If we wanted to change x into the name' Jill.

stationary languages are safe to workwith.However, you'd be in trouble, If you ran a business and suddenly charged' Jill' bones to someone's bank account. stationary- compartmented languages help these feathers of crimes long before they be. exemplifications of common static languages include Java, C, and Rust.

Dynamic languages easier to write, but further crimes latterly on
A dynamic language, on the other hand, optimizes for speed and ease of use. stoutly- compartmented languages let you pass any type of data to a variable. You do not need to describe a value before you start using it. For illustration, take the ensuing line of Python, a popular stoutly- compartmented language

JS is dynamic and TS is stationary
This is the core difference between JavaScript and TypeScript. While JavaScript is stoutly- compartmented, TypeScript is a statically- compartmented superset of JavaScript, which means it offers strict static codifying as an option but will allow dynamic typing, as well. As a result, TypeScript law is safer but a little trickier to write, performing in further crimes before in development. The language you use depends on the design you want to execute and the type of law you like to write.

let myString = 'this is js'


What TypeScript looks like
What does it mean that TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript? TypeScript only adds features to the JavaScript language; it doesn't circumscribe or change JavaScript itself. By writing a. ts file rather of a. js one, you can use TypeScript's type features to produce safer, more knowledgeable law as you see fit, but you are always free to write vanilla JavaScript within it.

let myString: string = 'this is ts'

Still, TypeScript would advise you that you were making a mistake while JavaScript would let you continue, If you ever tried to reassign the value with myString = 42.

It's important to note that TypeScript allows you to define all feathers of types beyond simple variables. You can define more complex data types like arrays, objects, and functions, and you can indeed define the specific shape of an object in advance using interfaces.

Defining complex data structures when they are first assigned means complex law is much easier to understand and maintain over time, since each data structure comes with its own description of its intended use.

Functions can also only accept certain types, and fabrics and specific npm packages can come with type delineations that drastically lower the literacy wind for new tools( since your autocomplete can recommend the external libraries' syntax.)

When to use TypeScript vs JavaScript?
It might be a good idea to set up TypeScript in your design if you're working on a large design with a bigteam.However, which can make writing your law much easier, If you're using external libraries and fabrics that offer type delineations. JavaScript may be a better choice if you want to write a quick script or particular design.

It might be a good idea to set up TypeScript in your design if you

are working on a large design with a big platoon, where crimes are more common and safety is consummate.
are using external libraries and fabrics that offer type delineations, which can make writing your law much easier.
have the time to learn TypeScript and write it.
JavaScript might be a better choice if you

are writing a quick script or particular design and do not want to write important law.
value the capability to snappily make out a design over maintaining it and precluding crimes in the long term.
noway learned TypeScript and do not have time to do so.
As you might imagine, learning TypeScript requires anon-trivial time commitment. still, numerous inventors claim that it saves them time in the long run by precluding tedious debugging and enabling better autocomplete in their law editors, enabling them to write law briskly. TypeScript is so well- loved it made it to the# 2 position in StackOverflow's check of utmost loved programming languages, and coders find it dyads well with a variety of fabrics.

It’s worth taking the time to experiment with TypeScript and gain some familiarity. numerous web development jobs will anticipate some experience with TypeScript, and because it's a superset of JavaScript, you do not have to learn everything in it all at formerly.


About Author

Neeraj kumar Goswami

Neeraj Kumar Goswami is a skilled and experienced backend developer with 1.5 years of industry expertise. He possesses a deep understanding of the latest technologies, including React JS, Angular JS, AWS Lambda, Node JS, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, SQL, and NoSQL databases. Neeraj has worked on various client projects namely Konfer, using the MEAN stack, Viztown Project , which was built on the MERN stack and BioGas Project, utilizing technologies such as Node JS, PostgreSQL, and AWS Lambda. He remains committed to constantly seeking new challenges and expanding his knowledge in latest technologies.

Request For Proposal

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

Ready to innovate ? Let's get in touch

Chat With Us